Man holding a woman to sleep, the woman you want to understand the reason
A) When in love, a man holding a woman to sleep.
Woman said: "I hold you too tight, hot ah! I quickly stifled."
Man smiled and said: "I like to hold you, or I can not sleep."
When they become husband and wife after the woman complained one day:
"You did not sleep at night, hold me, and I sleep a person what is the difference."
The man said: "hold together, we all sleep well, do not you think "
(B) One day, a man suddenly picked up the woman in the busy city, a long long way to go.
Woman says with a laugh: "You crazy Driving me down, people see the bad."
The man said: "What are they afraid I like to hold you."
Years later, women to men in the busy city like a baby: "hold me!"
The man said: "You crazy "
One day, a woman with a man, said: "hold me!"
Men obediently bend over the woman to bed
Some years later, a woman with a man, said: "hold me to bed!"
Men snappily said: "your feet off it "
(D) One day, the men promise to the woman:
"Even if you will become a big fat woman, I would hold you every day
You become an old woman, and I continue to hold you "
A few years later, a woman fat, old, and want the men to hold
Men snappily said: "Do you want to run over me "
Hard to believe, the day after holding a number of years you do not hold you, was actually the same man
Married, he brought you good fortune it!
After a few years you did not hold, the normal it!
Never mind!!
Maclean’s actions have a faint whiff of the arrogance of the political class that we saw so nakedly when Major lost in 1997, and we were told in no uncertain terms what a mistake we – the electorate – had made, and that we would be sorry. And yes, indeed, many of us were sorry. Not because of the Conservatives predictions that a Labour Government would revert to old-style tax and spend politics of the pre-Thatcherite era, but because we had been blind to the snake that shed its skin. From blue to red; Thatcher’s heir, in Tony Blair, had arrived.
Perhaps it’s too easy, during Blair’s last days in number 10, to attempt a retrospective of the last 10 years. In any case it’s not something I’ll get into now. Sufficed to say the sorrow that was felt by many in the months and years following May 1997 was not of regret that we had made the wrong decision, but of disillusionment that though we had made the right decision, it somehow still resulted in us having made the wrong one. It’s like playing poker, and finally betting when you have a full house, only to discover that the pack was rigged everyone else round the table somehow has a royal straight flush.
I am a member of the voter apathetic demographic. Around 50% of the under-35s do not vote. Which is not to say that they are politically unaware, or politically inactive. They/we are disenfranchised from the ridiculous attitude that Maclean’s recent actions embody. Maclean’s FoI amendment, by any measure, is an insult to the nature of democracy and open government. But what’s new, this amendment is not alone; party funding; party borrowing; the decision to invade Iraq, to name but a (high profile) few. Aside from whichever other criticisms you may choose to level in their name, these all reek of the same arrogance of the political class, who will continue to court enough of the real voting demographic (the over 45s) to maintain a status quo where they don’t have to care about what the rest of the Country thinks. I’m don’t necessarily think that this is true of all politicians, and certainly in the case of Maclean’s amendment, many MPs tried hard to reject the bill. But it was still passed. By a majority of 71.
没有评论:
发表评论